Queen Mary University of London / University of Jyväskylä

When the decision really matters, you need to know you’ve got it right

See how institutions are using Dimensions to make faster, fairer decisions across research security and academic hiring.

Why you should be getting all of your information in one place

If you’re responsible for research decisions, you’re carrying more risk than ever.

You’re being asked to approve collaborations you didn’t initiate and don’t understand the full picture of. You’re reviewing candidates you don’t have time to fully assess. And you’re signing off decisions that may be questioned months or years down the line.

And the information you need to do that properly is rarely in one place. In fact, it’s usually scattered across a range of outdated, unintuitive systems.

Dimensions brings that context together, so you can stop piecing things together manually and start working with a clear, defensible view of the full picture.

It means fewer unknowns, less back and forth, and decisions you can stand behind when they’re challenged.

How Queen Mary University of London made due diligence faster and more defensible

At Queen Mary University of London, due diligence checks used to rely on manual searches across multiple sources.

That meant:

  • Hours spent verifying affiliations and collaborations
  • Inconsistent results depending on who carried out the check
  • Growing pressure to evidence decisions for funders and audits

Now, their team can review a researcher, their network and their funding context in one place.

They can spot and act on potential risks quickly, understand where those risks come from, and keep a clear record of how decisions were made.

Quotes icon
I can see any potential risks at a glance and then drill down into the specifics.
Dr Melissa Bliss
Due Diligence and Compliance Officer at Queen Mary University of London

How the University of Jyväskylä built a fairer, more consistent hiring process

At the University of Jyväskylä, hiring panels were facing a different challenge.

Shortlists were long and publication histories were increasingly complex. There was a clear need to move away from judging candidates based on journal names alone.

So they built an automated workflow using Dimensions to:

  • Pull together a complete, accurate publication record
  • Surface a representative set of research outputs
  • Highlight impact using citation context and policy mentions
  • Map collaboration networks across institutions and countries

The result is a consistent, bias-aware starting point for every candidate.

Quotes icon
This is where the Dimensions API really shines.”
Janne-Tuomas Seppänen
Information Specialist, Open Science Centre of the University of Jyväskylä, Finland

Here’s what you’ll learn:

  • What faster, more reliable research security checks actually look like in practice
  • How to reduce manual effort while improving consistency and auditability
  • How to approach academic hiring in a way that aligns with DORA and CoARA
  • How to build a clearer, evidence-based view of research activity across your institution

Get case study

Evidence for the decisions that matter most